Zep and Spectron both target durable agent memory, but Spectron uses a single SurrealDB graph, explicit reconciliation, and a focused HTTP surface (/facts, /documents, /query, /chat).
Concept mapping
| Zep concept | Spectron equivalent | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| User | Scope path user=… | Scopes are hierarchical path strings |
| Session | Session + optional session_id on /facts/batch | Transcript introspection; batch ingest preferred |
| Memory context | POST .../context | Formatted string for prompts |
| Facts | Entities + attributes + relations | Extracted and reconciled |
| Zep Graph / knowledge | Documents + extracted graph | One unified graph |
| Summary | profile, reflect, consolidation | Reflection is explicit POST .../reflect |
API mapping
| Zep-style action | Spectron |
|---|---|
| Add message to session | POST /api/v1/{ctx}/facts/batch with messages[] |
| Search memory | POST /api/v1/{ctx}/query |
| Get memory context string | POST /api/v1/{ctx}/context |
| Add business data | POST /api/v1/{ctx}/documents or /facts with infer: "triples" |
Auth header: API-KEY. Base path: /api/v1/{context_id}/.
SDK sketch
Behavioural differences
Reconciliation — conflicting sources emit
uncertaintyinstead of silent overwrite.Authoritative vs experiential —
source.kinddistinguishes document vs turn provenance.Unified recall — one
/queryrouter over facts and passages.