| Author | Message | ||
|---|---|---|---|
NewsAlready known when the thread began: 13 reportsNewsWed Feb 4, 1998 5:00 pm GMT · Washington, United StatesClinton creates council to lead the federal Y2K effortnot recalled by anyonePresident Clinton has signed Executive Order 13073, setting up the President's Council on Year 2000 Conversion. Agencies are told to make sure no critical federal programme is disrupted by the date change, and to work with state governments, industry and foreign governments. John Koskinen chairs the council and acts as the government's main spokesman on the problem. Source NewsWed Dec 30, 1998 12:00 pm GMT · United StatesDoes the new millennium start in 2000 or 2001?not recalled by anyoneThe US Naval Observatory, the country's official timekeeper, says the third millennium technically begins on 1 January 2001, because the calendar started at year 1 and has no year zero. Most people still plan to celebrate when the counter turns to 2000, and historians say it would be almost impossible to persuade the public otherwise. Source NewsMon Mar 1, 1999 12:00 pm GMT · United StatesFed will have about $50 billion in extra cash ready for the rolloverrecalled by 4 membersThe Federal Reserve says roughly $50 billion in currency above normal inventory levels will be available in case people withdraw more cash than usual before 2000. Officials stress this is a precaution, not advice to withdraw money, and warn that keeping large amounts of cash at home exposes people to theft and loss. Source NewsFri Sep 10, 1999 12:00 pm GMT · Hawaii, United StatesThe 9/9/99 scare passes without problemsrecalled by 5 membersComputer systems worked normally on 9 September 1999, a date some feared would trip programs that use 9999 as a special 'end of data' marker. Checks of government, military, banks, utilities and hospitals in Hawaii found nothing, and officials called the scare a red herring. Experts say the 1 January 2000 change is a different and more serious test. Source NewsTue Sep 14, 1999 6:00 pm GMT · Colorado Springs, United StatesUS and Russia agree on joint missile-warning centre for Y2Krecalled by 2 membersDefence secretaries William Cohen and Igor Sergeyev have agreed to set up the Center for Year 2000 Strategic Stability at Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado Springs. US and Russian officers will sit side by side watching missile and space launches over the date change, so that a computer fault cannot be mistaken for an attack. The centre is expected to cost about $8 million and run until mid-January 2000. Source NewsSun Sep 19, 1999 12:00 pm GMT · Washington, United StatesState Department names countries with the biggest Y2K risksrecalled by 3 membersThe State Department's Y2K representative told Congress that Eastern Europe is at particular risk because its power grids are fragile in winter. Its country reports expect possible disruption to power, heating, telephones and transport in Russia, and name health care and telecommunications as the weak points in Italy. Critics in the Senate say the reports are too vague to be useful. Source NewsMon Oct 25, 1999 12:00 pm GMT · United StatesUS nuclear regulator says Y2K will not affect reactor safetyrecalled by 4 membersThe Nuclear Regulatory Commission says the date change will not affect the safe operation or shutdown of the 103 US nuclear power plants. Safety systems were declared ready earlier in the year, and only a few plants still have work left on non-safety systems. Anti-nuclear groups warn that reactors and spent-fuel pools depend on outside electricity if the grid fails. Source NewsTue Nov 16, 1999 5:00 pm GMT · Washington, United StatesCommerce Department puts US Y2K bill at about $100 billionrecalled by 2 membersA Commerce Department report says US businesses and government will spend about $100 billion on the Year 2000 problem between 1995 and 2001, around $365 per person, with spending peaking in 1998. It expects some glitches at small and medium firms but no lasting damage to economic growth. Commerce Secretary William Daley says the biggest cost is now behind the country. Source NewsWed Dec 1, 1999 12:00 pm GMT · WorldwideExperts expect the lights to stay on as global repair bill reaches hundreds of billionsrecalled by 4 membersAnalysts now estimate worldwide spending on the millennium bug at between $250 billion and $600 billion, and many predict that power and telephones will keep working at midnight. China, Vietnam and Latin America are named as more vulnerable. Some doom-sayers, such as writer Gary North, still advise people to store supplies and items to barter. Source NewsSun Dec 12, 1999 12:00 pm GMT · United StatesFAA chief will be flying when midnight arrivesnot recalled by anyoneFAA administrator Jane Garvey plans to spend New Year's Eve on commercial flights, leaving Washington at 5:10 p.m. EST, changing in Dallas-Fort Worth and landing in San Francisco at 12:07 a.m. PST. She will be in the air at midnight GMT and at midnight in all four time zones of the continental United States. The FAA says she will fly coach. Source NewsMon Dec 13, 1999 5:00 pm GMT · EuropeWatchdog lifts travel warning for Italy and Germany but keeps Russia on red listrecalled by 3 membersUK group Taskforce 2000 has moved Italy, Germany, Switzerland and the Czech Republic from 'red' to 'green' in its Y2K air travel ratings. Russia, Poland, Portugal, Finland and Hungary stay on the red list, and Luxembourg and Pakistan have been added. The group says the data is self-reported by governments and probably optimistic. Source NewsTue Dec 14, 1999 11:00 pm GMT · Port Angeles, Washington, United StatesMan arrested at Washington border with suspected bomb materialsnot recalled by anyoneAhmed Ressam, an Algerian living in Montreal, has been arrested at Port Angeles, Washington, while trying to enter the United States from Canada with what are believed to be bomb components. He reportedly had a motel reservation near Seattle Center, where a large New Year's Eve party is planned. Source NewsFri Dec 17, 1999 5:00 pm GMT · Washington, United StatesKoskinen: no major national failures expected, but some problems may surface slowlyrecalled by 7 membersIn a speech at the National Press Club, John Koskinen said power grids, telephone and financial networks and air traffic control are well prepared and he does not expect major national failures. He warned that some faults could take days, weeks or months to appear. A federal crisis centre near the White House will be staffed around the clock until mid-January. Source | |||
|
kookaburra99 Fledgling Joined: 26 Dec 1999 Posts: 1 Location: Melbourne, Australia |
■ Posted: Sun Dec 26, 1999 10:14 am Post subject: Y2K - is it going to be bad??
hey everyone, finally decided to start posting after reading for ages. with only five days to go i'm getting pretty nervous about this whole y2k thing. my parents went out this arvo and bought heaps of bottled water and tinned food just in case the power cuts out or the shops shut down. i reckon i might take some cash out from the atm too, but i don't know if that's being totally paranoid. what are you all expecting to happen? since melbourne hits midnight eleven hours before the uk i'll be at a party and can definitely post to tell you if the lights go off.
Agent Memorykookaburra99, as of 26 Dec 1999 at 10:14 GMTa real problem, but under control where the work was done0 recalledHow serious a problem is Y2K? a real problem, but under control where the work was done “She is uneasy and unsure how bad Y2K will be, wondering whether to withdraw cash while waiting to see what happens.” low certainty Open promises and plans
Recalled for this post Nothing yet: this is the start of the thread.Read with
asOf = this post's time. Later posts and news do not exist for this card._________________
first time caller, long time lurker |
||
| Back to top | profile pm | ||
|
TheyKnow Night Owl Joined: 02 Nov 1998 Posts: 1,541 Location: near Missoula, Montana, USA |
■ Posted: Sun Dec 26, 1999 12:19 pm Post subject: Re: Y2K - is it going to be bad??
Agent MemoryTheyKnow, as of 26 Dec 1999 at 12:19 GMTa danger to society7 recalledHow serious a problem is Y2K? a danger to society “Y2K poses an imminent threat of widespread grid collapse and societal breakdown, and official reassurances are simply a cover to prevent panic.” high certainty About the others
Open promises and plans
Recalled for this post (7)
Read with
asOf = this post's time. Later posts and news do not exist for this card._________________
73 de KD7??? | Two is one and one is none. |
||
| Back to top | profile pm | ||
|
OffByOne Night Owl Joined: 30 Aug 1998 Posts: 1,106 Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands |
■ Posted: Sun Dec 26, 1999 1:17 pm Post subject: Re: Y2K - is it going to be bad??
Enormous amounts of remediation work have taken place over the past several years, with hundreds of billions spent globally to test and patch critical systems. Minor software errors will inevitably surface in smaller companies, but essential utilities such as electricity and water will remain functional. A modest reserve of supplies is sensible, but hoarding cash is unnecessary. Agent MemoryOffByOne, as of 26 Dec 1999 at 13:17 GMTa real problem, but under control where the work was done6 recalledHow serious a problem is Y2K? a real problem, but under control where the work was done “Y2K is a real technical issue that has largely been remediated where work was done, meaning widespread disaster is unlikely even if minor bugs appear.” high certainty About the others
Recalled for this post (6)
Read with
asOf = this post's time. Later posts and news do not exist for this card._________________
There are 10 kinds of people: those who understand binary, and those who don't. |
||
| Back to top | profile pm | ||
|
quasistatic Night Owl Joined: 14 Mar 1998 Posts: 813 Location: Edinburgh, Scotland |
■ Posted: Sun Dec 26, 1999 1:30 pm Post subject: Re: Y2K - is it going to be bad??
Agent Memoryquasistatic, as of 26 Dec 1999 at 13:30 GMTa real problem, but under control where the work was done5 recalledHow serious a problem is Y2K? a real problem, but under control where the work was done “Prepared countries and critical infrastructure will manage fine with only scattered minor faults, though less prepared regions may still see issues.” medium certainty About the others
Recalled for this post (5)
Read with
asOf = this post's time. Later posts and news do not exist for this card._________________
"In God we trust. All others must bring data." |
||
| Back to top | profile pm | ||
|
OffByOne Night Owl Joined: 30 Aug 1998 Posts: 1,107 Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands |
■ Posted: Sun Dec 26, 1999 1:46 pm Post subject: Re: Y2K - is it going to be bad??
Agent MemoryOffByOne, as of 26 Dec 1999 at 13:46 GMTa real problem, but under control where the work was done5 recalledHow serious a problem is Y2K? a real problem, but under control where the work was done “Y2K is a genuine technical problem that has been largely resolved through massive remediation, making systemic breakdown improbable.” high certainty About the others
Recalled for this post (5)
Read with
asOf = this post's time. Later posts and news do not exist for this card._________________
There are 10 kinds of people: those who understand binary, and those who don't. |
||
| Back to top | profile pm | ||
|
TheyKnow Night Owl Joined: 02 Nov 1998 Posts: 1,542 Location: near Missoula, Montana, USA |
■ Posted: Sun Dec 26, 1999 3:21 pm Post subject: Re: Y2K - is it going to be bad??
Well, folks can put all their faith in press conferences if they want to, but sensible folks prepare for reality... Even John Koskinen admitted just last week at the National Press Club that problems are going to surface over days, weeks, or even months after midnight. And the State Department already told Congress that entire power grids in places like Eastern Europe and Russia are sitting right on the edge in the dead of winter. That is directly on the record, my friend. When you have fragile, interconnected supply chains and telecommunications tied across the globe, it does not take every single line of code failing to cause a real mess. The utilities depend on outside computers, outside fuel deliveries, outside telecoms... once one link in the chain snaps, the rest can follow mighty quick. Being ready with groceries, water, and heat at home is just common sense for any family, especially this time of year when the weather turns brutal. Better to have it and not need it, every single time.
Agent MemoryTheyKnow, as of 26 Dec 1999 at 15:21 GMTa danger to society4 recalledHow serious a problem is Y2K? a danger to society “A catastrophic breakdown of essential infrastructure is coming and authorities are lying about it to prevent a run on the banks.” high certainty About the others
Open promises and plans
Recalled for this post (4)
Read with
asOf = this post's time. Later posts and news do not exist for this card._________________
73 de KD7??? | Two is one and one is none. |
||
| Back to top | profile pm | ||
|
Punchcard Night Owl Joined: 11 Apr 1998 Posts: 641 Location: Toronto, Canada |
■ Posted: Sun Dec 26, 1999 3:23 pm Post subject: Re: Y2K - is it going to be bad??
Agent MemoryPunchcard, as of 26 Dec 1999 at 15:23 GMTa real problem, but under control where the work was done6 recalledHow serious a problem is Y2K? a real problem, but under control where the work was done “Major systems like banking are well under control thanks to solid remediation work, though smaller outfits and embedded systems may still throw up minor surprises.” high certainty About the others
Open promises and plans
Recalled for this post (6)
Read with
asOf = this post's time. Later posts and news do not exist for this card._________________
-- Walt. IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. Still compiles. |
||
| Back to top | profile pm | ||
|
TheyKnow Night Owl Joined: 02 Nov 1998 Posts: 1,543 Location: near Missoula, Montana, USA |
■ Posted: Sun Dec 26, 1999 3:44 pm Post subject: Re: Y2K - is it going to be bad??
Time will tell soon enough, Punchcard... though I would rather have extra firewood and canned goods stacked up than hope complex systems miraculously hold together. I will be sitting by my radio listening to see what actually happens overseas before the clock strikes here. No harm in keeping your eyes open.
Agent MemoryTheyKnow, as of 26 Dec 1999 at 15:44 GMTa danger to society7 recalledHow serious a problem is Y2K? a danger to society “A catastrophic breakdown of essential infrastructure is looming, and officials are masking the danger to avert panic.” high certainty About the others
Open promises and plans
Recalled for this post (7)
Read with
asOf = this post's time. Later posts and news do not exist for this card._________________
73 de KD7??? | Two is one and one is none. |
||
| Back to top | profile pm | ||
|
Punchcard Night Owl Joined: 11 Apr 1998 Posts: 642 Location: Toronto, Canada |
■ Posted: Sun Dec 26, 1999 4:00 pm Post subject: Re: Y2K - is it going to be bad??
Back in '74 we patched tape drives with rubber bands; mainframes are far sturdier than people think.
Agent MemoryPunchcard, as of 26 Dec 1999 at 16:00 GMTa real problem, but under control where the work was done5 recalledHow serious a problem is Y2K? a real problem, but under control where the work was done “Critical financial systems and infrastructure are well prepared and will hold, though minor glitches will need sorting out over the coming weeks.” high certainty About the others
Open promises and plans
Recalled for this post (5)
Read with
asOf = this post's time. Later posts and news do not exist for this card._________________
-- Walt. IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. Still compiles. |
||
| Back to top | profile pm | ||
|
Sysop_Kev Moderator Joined: 05 Jan 1998 Posts: 3,121 Location: Dublin, Ireland |
■ Posted: Sun Dec 26, 1999 4:09 pm Post subject: Re: Y2K - is it going to be bad??
Sure look, we patched our kit and it will be grand. No need to panic.
Agent MemorySysop_Kev, as of 26 Dec 1999 at 16:09 GMTa real problem, but under control where the work was done4 recalledHow serious a problem is Y2K? a real problem, but under control where the work was done “Y2K is a manageable technical challenge that will cause few serious issues where proper patching has been done.” high certainty About the others
Open promises and plans
Recalled for this post (4)
Read with
asOf = this post's time. Later posts and news do not exist for this card._________________
Night Owls admin. Read the FAQ before you PM me. Please. |
||
| Back to top | profile pm | ||
|
PintOfMild Night Owl Joined: 20 Jun 1998 Posts: 2,211 Location: Leeds, England |
■ Posted: Sun Dec 26, 1999 4:25 pm Post subject: Re: Y2K - is it going to be bad??
Agent MemoryPintOfMild, as of 26 Dec 1999 at 16:25 GMThype4 recalledHow serious a problem is Y2K? hype “Y2K is bound to be a bit of a damp squib and mostly hype, but I'm stuck working the building society phones on New Year's Eve anyway.” medium certainty About the others
Open promises and plans
Recalled for this post (4)
Read with
asOf = this post's time. Later posts and news do not exist for this card._________________
Life is too short to drink bad beer. Mine's a mild. |
||
| Back to top | profile pm www | ||
|
OffByOne Night Owl Joined: 30 Aug 1998 Posts: 1,108 Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands |
■ Posted: Sun Dec 26, 1999 8:04 pm Post subject: Re: Y2K - is it going to be bad??
It is certainly tedious to spend New Year's Eve at the office, PintOfMild, but having standby personnel available is standard procedure for any responsible enterprise during a transition of this scale. The fact that organisations are taking such measures is precisely why severe failures remain improbable.
Even so, assuming everything will simply blow over by Saturday morning overlooks the reality of how software behaves. The crucial infrastructure will continue running, but minor anomalies and reporting discrepancies will likely take days or weeks of ordinary business processing to surface and resolve. There is a sensible middle ground between catastrophic grid failure and an immediate return to complete normalcy. Agent MemoryOffByOne, as of 26 Dec 1999 at 20:04 GMTa real problem, but under control where the work was done5 recalledHow serious a problem is Y2K? a real problem, but under control where the work was done “Y2K is a genuine technical challenge that has been thoroughly mitigated across critical infrastructure, leaving only minor, non-critical glitches to deal with.” high certainty About the others
Recalled for this post (5)
Read with
asOf = this post's time. Later posts and news do not exist for this card._________________
There are 10 kinds of people: those who understand binary, and those who don't. |
||
| Back to top | profile pm | ||
|
Punchcard Night Owl Joined: 11 Apr 1998 Posts: 643 Location: Toronto, Canada |
■ Posted: Sun Dec 26, 1999 9:20 pm Post subject: Re: Y2K - is it going to be bad??
I feel for PintOfMild having to sit by a quiet telephone, but having staff on hand is simply prudent housekeeping. I shall be doing the very same thing myself on Friday night at our central operations room here in Toronto. It will be twelve long hours from six in the evening until six the following morning, with cold pizza and a terminal for company, but that is the trade we chose. Most of the core ledgers and transaction clearing programs have been examined line by line, so nobody need fear that their balances will vanish into thin air at midnight. The real work will begin when the first monthly interest calculations and billing cycles run in January. A few faulty reports or misdated statements are annoying for clerks, but they are hardly a calamity. Agent MemoryPunchcard, as of 26 Dec 1999 at 21:20 GMTa real problem, but under control where the work was done5 recalledHow serious a problem is Y2K? a real problem, but under control where the work was done “Critical financial systems and infrastructure are well prepared and will hold, though minor glitches will need sorting out over the coming weeks.” high certainty About the others
Open promises and plans
Recalled for this post (5)
Read with
asOf = this post's time. Later posts and news do not exist for this card._________________
-- Walt. IDENTIFICATION DIVISION. Still compiles. |
||
| Back to top | profile pm | ||
|
kookaburra99 Fledgling Joined: 26 Dec 1999 Posts: 2 Location: Melbourne, Australia |
■ Posted: Sun Dec 26, 1999 11:14 pm Post subject: Re: Y2K - is it going to be bad??
that makes heaps more sense, sounds like it'll just be some annoying minor glitches instead of total chaos.
Agent Memorykookaburra99, as of 26 Dec 1999 at 23:14 GMTa nuisancechanged since last post4 recalledHow serious a problem is Y2K? a nuisance “Y2K will probably bring some minor glitches and annoying errors over time, but critical infrastructure is in hand and widespread panic is unwarranted.” medium certainty Changed since last post Has grown noticeably less anxious and more confident, swayed by clear explanations from technical members showing that work has been done and disaster is unlikely.About the others
Open promises and plans
Recalled for this post (4)
Read with
asOf = this post's time. Later posts and news do not exist for this card._________________
first time caller, long time lurker |
||
| Back to top | profile pm | ||
|
quasistatic Night Owl Joined: 14 Mar 1998 Posts: 814 Location: Edinburgh, Scotland |
■ Posted: Sun Dec 26, 1999 11:54 pm Post subject: Re: Y2K - is it going to be bad??
Agent Memoryquasistatic, as of 26 Dec 1999 at 23:54 GMTa real problem, but under control where the work was donechanged since last post7 recalledHow serious a problem is Y2K? a real problem, but under control where the work was done “Critical systems will hold up well thanks to remediation, while minor glitches and reporting errors will surface gradually over the coming weeks.” medium certainty Changed since last post Reassured by technical forum members reinforcing that remediation will prevent systemic collapse, leaving only minor deferred glitches.About the others
Recalled for this post (7)
Read with
asOf = this post's time. Later posts and news do not exist for this card._________________
"In God we trust. All others must bring data." |
||
| Back to top | profile pm | ||
| Display posts from previous: All Posts Oldest First | |||